Re: Question about casts

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Hallgren <thomas(at)tada(dot)se>
Cc: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Question about casts
Date: 2006-05-18 17:40:27
Message-ID: 16070.1147974027@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas Hallgren <thomas(at)tada(dot)se> writes:
> I would have thought that casting into the
> string types was something that could be hardwired since the backing
> functions are mandatory.

This has been proposed before, and seems reasonable to me (as long as
the casts are explicit-only), and I think it's listed in TODO; but
nobody's gotten around to it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-05-18 17:42:54 Re: Compression and on-disk sorting
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-05-18 17:35:48 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?