| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: fix for strict-alias warnings |
| Date: | 2003-10-15 15:49:17 |
| Message-ID: | 15959.1066232957@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
"Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Interestingly, a lot of the comparison and call to memset() still seem to be
> optimised away, but the loop from MemSet is left, so the multiplication is
> also not optimised away.
Yeah, I saw the same in gcc 3.2 (on Intel) yesterday. I thought maybe
3.3 would fix that, since it sure looks like an optimization bug, but
evidently not.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-10-15 15:51:26 | Re: postgres --help-config |
| Previous Message | kkim3 | 2003-10-15 15:43:07 | Question about debugger |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fabrizio Mazzoni | 2003-10-15 18:00:34 | pg_dump italian corrected |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-10-15 15:24:27 | Re: fix for strict-alias warnings |