Re: suitable text search configuration

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: suitable text search configuration
Date: 2007-10-24 22:14:04
Message-ID: 15910.1193264044@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Actually, looking at the examples so far, I'm thinking we should just
>> consider the string up to the first _, period.

> Can anyone point to a real world example where country by country would
> make sense?

For the current set of built-in dictionaries it seems pretty clear that
country distinctions are useless. If we ever did need that distinction
it would only be after adding dictionaries that aren't going to be in
8.3 ... so I'm leaning to keeping the code simple for the moment.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-10-24 22:17:47 Re: suitable text search configuration
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2007-10-24 21:58:12 Re: suitable text search configuration