Re: Feature request - function-based deferrable uniques.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Dmitry Fefelov <fozzy(at)ac-sw(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Feature request - function-based deferrable uniques.
Date: 2010-04-01 14:40:25
Message-ID: 15876.1270132825@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> The reason it's not supported in table_constraint, IIUC, is that the
> standard doesn't allow it, and that syntax is standards-mandated.

The real problem is not so much extending the syntax as that there'd be
no way to represent the constraint in information_schema. Exclusion
constraints are outside the standard already, so omitting them from the
information_schema views is less bad than missing unique constraints
would be.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-04-01 15:19:26 Re: missing schema qualifications in psql
Previous Message Ross J. Reedstrom 2010-04-01 14:39:04 Re: Alias to rollback keyword