"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> There are two things here. One having a default value 8.2 currently
> doesn't
I'm not really convinced by this argument. pg_autovacuum was never
designed to be user-friendly; it is designed to be the back end storage
for something that *is* user-friendly (which we have not got yet).
I would say that smarts about defaults ought to go into whatever code
you are creating that inserts into pg_autovacuum.
regards, tom lane