Re: Fwd: 8.1beta2 vacuum analyze hanging on idle database

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Subject: Re: Fwd: 8.1beta2 vacuum analyze hanging on idle database
Date: 2005-10-05 19:08:26
Message-ID: 1587.1128539306@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
> On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 02:27:32PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> For working with a beta release, --enable-cassert isn't a bad idea
>> either, though it is probably not relevant to your problem.

> Also, note that --enable-cassert will reduce performance somewhat, and
> may make the bug go away.

True --- but there's also a chance it could expose the bug immediately.
It'd be worth trying both ways.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message elein 2005-10-05 19:10:22 Re: [Slony1-general] Re: Slony RPM issue
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2005-10-05 18:58:53 Re: Updated documentation for new sequence binding