| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgindent run? |
| Date: | 2001-03-22 05:11:36 |
| Message-ID: | 15863.985237896@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> and most times, those have to be merged into the source tree due to
> extensive changes anyway ... maybe we should just get rid of the use of
> pgindent altogether?
I think pgindent is a good thing; the style of different parts of the
code would vary too much without it. I'm only unhappy about the risk
issues of running it at this late stage of the release cycle.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-03-22 05:13:28 | Re: pgindent run? |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-03-22 05:10:06 | Re: pgindent run? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-03-22 05:13:28 | Re: pgindent run? |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-03-22 05:10:06 | Re: pgindent run? |