Re: union query

"Tamsin" <tg_mail(at)bryncadfan(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> select 'other' union select description from address;
> ERROR: Unable to transform varchar to unknown
> Each UNION | EXCEPT | INTERSECT clause must have compatible target
> types

The behavior in 7.0.* and before (as far back as I recall) has been that
the first select determines the output type of the union, so the above
fails, but reversing it works. 7.1 is a little smarter about
unknown-type literals, so it accepts both of your cases, but it will
still do the Wrong Thing for examples like select int4 union select int8.

> I just wondered
> if the order of the selects in a union should matter?

It shouldn't, really, but without a complete type promotion hierarchy
we have a hard time doing anything intelligent with arbitrary pairs of
types.

regards, tom lane