Re: Re: [PATCHES] Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Joe Conway" <joseph(dot)conway(at)home(dot)com>
Cc: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "PostgreSQL Development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCHES] Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal
Date: 2001-06-14 01:40:55
Message-ID: 15803.992482855@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

"Joe Conway" <joseph(dot)conway(at)home(dot)com> writes:
>> Too late ;-). I just finished ripping out the unneeded parts and
>> applying.

> Thanks! I take it I still need to do the documentation though ;)

I put in a few words in func.sgml, but feel free to improve on it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sergio Bruder 2001-06-14 01:57:33 corrupted document in 7.1.2
Previous Message Joe Conway 2001-06-14 01:37:00 Re: Re: [PATCHES] Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-06-14 02:52:59 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal
Previous Message Joe Conway 2001-06-14 01:37:00 Re: Re: [PATCHES] Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal