From: | "Joe Conway" <joseph(dot)conway(at)home(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "PostgreSQL Development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: [PATCHES] Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal |
Date: | 2001-06-14 01:37:00 |
Message-ID: | 009901c0f472$829e85d0$d7d310ac@jecw2k1 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
>
> Too late ;-). I just finished ripping out the unneeded parts and
> applying.
Thanks! I take it I still need to do the documentation though ;)
>
> I made a few minor changes too, mostly removing unnecessary code
> (you don't need to call nameout, everyone else just uses NameStr)
> and trying to line up stylistically with other code. One actual
> bug noted: you were doing this in a couple of places:
>
Once again, thanks for the "important safety tips". I saw references to this
trap in the comments, and therefore should have known better. I guess only
practice makes perfect (hopefully!).
-- Joe
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-06-14 01:40:55 | Re: Re: [PATCHES] Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-06-14 01:27:20 | Re: Re: [PATCHES] Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-06-14 01:40:55 | Re: Re: [PATCHES] Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-06-14 01:27:20 | Re: Re: [PATCHES] Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal |