Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Lower *_freeze_max_age minimum values.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Lower *_freeze_max_age minimum values.
Date: 2015-10-05 13:51:31
Message-ID: 15694.1444053091@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2015-10-05 09:39:58 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> How about "Setting autovacuum_freeze_max_age to very small values
>> is unwise since it will force frequent vacuuming."

> Well, you still can't really set it to a very small value - the lower
> limits are still 100k/10k for xids/mxids. To me that sentence mostly
> made sense with the old logic where no lower limits existed.

Good point. Agreed, let's just flush it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2015-10-05 14:09:49 pgsql: pgcrypto: Detect and report too-short crypt() salts.
Previous Message Andres Freund 2015-10-05 13:45:39 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Lower *_freeze_max_age minimum values.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2015-10-05 13:58:26 Re: ON CONFLICT issues around whole row vars,
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-10-05 13:50:26 Re: ON CONFLICT issues around whole row vars,