Re: ORDER BY 1 COLLATE

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ORDER BY 1 COLLATE
Date: 2011-04-18 20:20:49
Message-ID: 15684.1303158049@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> This came from a review by Noah Misch a great while ago:
> test=> SELECT b FROM foo ORDER BY 1 COLLATE "C";
> ERROR: 42804: collations are not supported by type integer

> According to SQL92, this should be supported. Do we want to bother? It
> doesn't look hard to fix, so it's really only a question of whether this
> would be useful, or its absence would be too confusing.

The ORDER BY 1 business seems to me to be legacy anyway. I'm not
inclined to put in even more hacks to make strange combinations work
there --- I think we're likely to find ourselves painted into a corner
someday as it is.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2011-04-18 20:43:18 Re: ORDER BY 1 COLLATE
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2011-04-18 20:08:52 ORDER BY 1 COLLATE