Re: Unicode combining characters

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at, pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, phede-ml(at)islande(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Unicode combining characters
Date: 2001-10-04 03:05:16
Message-ID: 15665.1002164716@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> To accomplish this, I moved MatchText etc. to a separate file and now
> like.c includes it *twice* (similar technique used in regexec()). This
> makes like.o a little bit larger, but I believe this is worth for the
> optimization.

That sounds great.

What's your feeling now about the original question: whether to enable
multibyte by default now, or not? I'm still thinking that Peter's
counsel is the wisest: plan to do it in 7.3, not today. But this fix
seems to eliminate the only hard reason we have not to do it today ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lincoln Yeoh 2001-10-04 03:15:52 Feature suggestion: Postgresql binding to one IP?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-10-04 02:47:28 Re: BUG: text(varchar) truncates at 31 bytes

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2001-10-04 03:43:23 Re: Unicode combining characters
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2001-10-04 02:16:42 Re: Unicode combining characters