Re: COPYable logs status

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: COPYable logs status
Date: 2007-06-09 13:49:29
Message-ID: 15615.1181396969@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

"Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> We *have* a log-writing process. The problem is in getting the data to it.

> By that I assume you mean the bgwriter, I thought that was for WAL data,

No, I'm talking about src/backend/postmaster/syslogger.c

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeroen T. Vermeulen 2007-06-09 14:01:21 Re: Using the GPU
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-06-09 13:46:41 Re: COPYable logs status

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-06-09 13:58:43 Re: Synchronized scans
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-06-09 13:46:41 Re: COPYable logs status