Re: [PATCHES] WITH DELIMITERS in COPY

From: Lee Kindness <lkindness(at)csl(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] WITH DELIMITERS in COPY
Date: 2002-03-05 17:07:14
Message-ID: 15492.64322.981365.159706@kelvin.csl.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Tom Lane writes:
> [ COPY syntax ]
> If we were working in a green field I'd vote for moving BINARY into the
> WITH-options too, but we aren't. Again that seems too likely to break
> things in the name of a small amount of added consistency.

Hawabout 'COPY ...' retains the existing syntax but if used like 'COPY
TABLE ...' sane syntax is used?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rod Taylor 2002-03-05 17:46:27 Re: Database Caching
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2002-03-05 16:46:52 Mandrake RPMs uploaded

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-03-05 17:56:24 Re: enable debugging in jdbc
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-03-05 16:17:16 Re: [PATCHES] WITH DELIMITERS in COPY