Re: Is "trust" really a good default?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Is "trust" really a good default?
Date: 2004-07-13 14:07:27
Message-ID: 15492.1089727647@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes:
>> This isn't happening for a number of reasons, the most
>> obvious being that we cannot require initdb to be run
>> interactively. (That stern warning will not impress /dev/null.)

> This is the very reason --pwfile was added.

No, that does not address the objection in the least. That simply
allows a level of indirection. There still has to be user interaction
going on somewhere to supply the password.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2004-07-13 14:28:18 Re: Assisting developers
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-07-13 14:02:10 Assisting developers