Re: Strange query optimization in 7.3.2

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alec Mitchell <apm13(at)columbia(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Strange query optimization in 7.3.2
Date: 2003-04-16 04:40:54
Message-ID: 15412.1050468054@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Alec Mitchell <apm13(at)columbia(dot)edu> writes:
> I applied the patch to the 7.3.2 sources, but strangely I get a segfault when
> I run initdb using the patched PostgreSQL. Specifically I get this error:

Sigh ... I do know better than to commit changes without having
regression-tested 'em. Honest ;-)

Add this patch atop the last:

*** src/backend/utils/adt/selfuncs.c.orig Tue Apr 15 01:18:12 2003
--- src/backend/utils/adt/selfuncs.c Wed Apr 16 00:37:58 2003
***************
*** 1610,1617 ****
* side? It seems that if we assume equal distribution for the
* other side, we end up with the same answer anyway.
*/
! double nullfrac1 = stats1->stanullfrac;
! double nullfrac2 = stats2->stanullfrac;

selec = (1.0 - nullfrac1) * (1.0 - nullfrac2);
if (nd1 > nd2)
--- 1610,1617 ----
* side? It seems that if we assume equal distribution for the
* other side, we end up with the same answer anyway.
*/
! double nullfrac1 = stats1 ? stats1->stanullfrac : 0.0;
! double nullfrac2 = stats2 ? stats2->stanullfrac : 0.0;

selec = (1.0 - nullfrac1) * (1.0 - nullfrac2);
if (nd1 > nd2)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yuriy Rusinov 2003-04-16 05:23:56 Directory for database cluster
Previous Message Robert Treat 2003-04-16 03:48:42 Re: Postgres Compare