Re: Partial vacuum versus pg_class.reltuples

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Partial vacuum versus pg_class.reltuples
Date: 2009-06-07 17:08:16
Message-ID: 15350.1244394496@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Sat, 2009-06-06 at 15:44 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> In the longer term, we need to do something else.

> -1 for such radical change at this stage of release.

Uh, by "longer term" I meant this is something to think about for 8.5.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2009-06-07 17:34:44 Re: pg_migrator issue with contrib
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2009-06-07 17:03:09 Re: Partial vacuum versus pg_class.reltuples