delayed mail?

Tatsuo Ishii writes:
> I saw over 7 hours delay between postgresql.org and sever1.pgsql.org.
> Does anynone know what's happening here?

I've seen massive delays too:

Received: from mail.csl.co.uk by euphrates.csl.co.uk (8.9.3/ConceptI 2.4)
id EAA08864; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 04:24:41 +0100 (BST)
Received: from server1.pgsql.org by mail.csl.co.uk (8.11.1/ConceptO 2.3)
id f9G3Oh219345; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 04:24:44 +0100
Received: from postgresql.org (webmail.postgresql.org [216.126.85.28])
by server1.pgsql.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f9G3Ljq66512
for <lkindness(at)csl(dot)co(dot)uk>; Mon, 15 Oct 2001 22:23:36 -0500 (CDT)
(envelope-from pgsql-hackers-owner+M14283=csl(dot)co(dot)uk=lkindness(at)postgresql(dot)org)
Received: from mail1.hub.org (webmail.hub.org [216.126.85.1])
by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f9FNaKP72316
for <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>; Mon, 15 Oct 2001 19:36:20 -0400 (EDT)
(envelope-from pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us)
Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (candle.navpoint.com [162.33.245.46])
by mail1.hub.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f9FGg8X57598
for <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>; Mon, 15 Oct 2001 12:42:08 -0400 (EDT)
(envelope-from pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us)
Received: (from pgman(at)localhost)
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) id f9FGg6g02963
for pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org; Mon, 15 Oct 2001 12:42:06 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <200110151642(dot)f9FGg6g02963(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>

and this one's days:

Received: from mail.csl.co.uk by euphrates.csl.co.uk (8.9.3/ConceptI 2.4)
id KAA11316; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 10:34:03 +0100 (BST)
Received: from postgresql.org by mail.csl.co.uk (8.11.1/ConceptO 2.3)
id f9G9Y3220747; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 10:34:03 +0100
Received: from postgresql.org (webmail.postgresql.org [216.126.85.28])
by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with SMTP id f9G0GHP83130;
Mon, 15 Oct 2001 20:16:27 -0400 (EDT)
(envelope-from pgsql-announce-owner+M120(at)postgresql(dot)org)
Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (candle.navpoint.com [162.33.245.46])
by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f9D4our63609;
Sat, 13 Oct 2001 00:50:56 -0400 (EDT)
(envelope-from pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us)
Received: (from pgman(at)localhost)
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) id f9D4oqo09577;
Sat, 13 Oct 2001 00:50:52 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <200110130450(dot)f9D4oqo09577(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>

Hardly any (yours omong the excepted, headers below) messages are
coming through in a timely fashion:

Received: from mail.csl.co.uk by euphrates.csl.co.uk (8.9.3/ConceptI 2.4)
id PAA14131; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 15:17:46 +0100 (BST)
Received: from server1.pgsql.org by mail.csl.co.uk (8.11.1/ConceptO 2.3)
id f9GEHl222496; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 15:17:47 +0100
Received: from postgresql.org (webmail.postgresql.org [216.126.85.28])
by server1.pgsql.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f9GEEEs48462
for <lkindness(at)csl(dot)co(dot)uk>; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 09:16:31 -0500 (CDT)
(envelope-from pgsql-hackers-owner+M14305=csl(dot)co(dot)uk=lkindness(at)postgresql(dot)org)
Received: from sraigw.sra.co.jp (sraigw.sra.co.jp [202.32.10.2])
by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f9GCDVP15349
for <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 08:13:32 -0400 (EDT)
(envelope-from t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp)
Received: from sranhm.sra.co.jp (sranhm [133.137.13.152])
by sraigw.sra.co.jp (8.9.3/3.7W-sraigw) with ESMTP id VAA16107
for <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 21:13:28 +0900 (JST)
Received: from localhost (IDENT:t-ishii(at)portsv3-24(dot)sra(dot)co(dot)jp [133.137.84.24])
by sranhm.sra.co.jp (8.9.3+3.2W/3.7W-srambox) with ESMTP id VAA10335
for <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 21:13:26 +0900
Message-Id: <20011016211312V(dot)t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
Lee.