Re: greatest/least semantics different between oracle and postgres

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "paul rivers" <rivers(dot)paul(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "'Ben'" <bench(at)silentmedia(dot)com>, "'PostgreSQL General \(\(EN\)\)'" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: greatest/least semantics different between oracle and postgres
Date: 2007-06-30 05:44:41
Message-ID: 15294.1183182281@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"paul rivers" <rivers(dot)paul(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> But I question the original poster's report of Oracle's behavior. I don't
> have 9.2.0.8 to test, but on 9.2.0.7:

Er ... your example doesn't actually seem to involve greatest() or
least()?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message paul rivers 2007-06-30 05:51:42 Re: greatest/least semantics different between oracle and postgres
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-06-30 05:32:27 Re: greatest/least semantics different between oracle and postgres