Re: Fix to CVE-2006-0553 for 8.1.1

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Fix to CVE-2006-0553 for 8.1.1
Date: 2006-02-20 01:58:38
Message-ID: 15237.1140400718@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Albert Chin <pgsql-hackers(at)mlists(dot)thewrittenword(dot)com> writes:
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 05:14:32PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Why in the world would you not install 8.1.3 instead? Or are you hoping
>> to get burnt by one of the *other* bugs in 8.1.1?

> We've already deployed 8.1.1 to some customers. We will offer 8.1.3
> but if they want to upgrade 8.1.1 to fix the security issue, we want
> this to be an option.

You want an option to leave data-loss-causing bugs unfixed, eh? Make
sure you make those customers sign a disclaimer that it's their fault
not yours when the ReadBuffer bug eats their data.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2006-02-20 02:02:23 Re: [PERFORM] Need pointers to "standard" pg database(s) for testing
Previous Message Douglas McNaught 2006-02-20 01:41:01 Re: postgresql query string length limit