PL/Tcl implementation

From: fschmidt <fschmidt(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: PL/Tcl implementation
Date: 2008-01-31 21:41:41
Message-ID: 15215251.post@talk.nabble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


Why doesn't the PL/Tcl (and PL/Python) implementation use the SPI functions?
For example pltcl_set_tuple_values() calls NameStr() instead of SPI_fname()
and heap_getattr() instead of SPI_getbinval(). Why? This makes the code
impossible to follow for someone who is not familiar with the postgres
source and has only read the online documentation.

--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/PL-Tcl-implementation-tp15215251p15215251.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-02-01 01:41:44 Re: Is PostGreSql's Data storage mechanism "inferior"?
Previous Message Guy Rouillier 2008-01-31 21:40:11 Re: postgresql book - practical or something newer?