Re: [HACKERS] configure --with-xxxx problem

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>
Cc: hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] configure --with-xxxx problem
Date: 1999-05-14 14:46:04
Message-ID: 15198.926693164@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> writes:
> you can specify any option begins from --with-
> configure will not complain about unknown option, just silently ignore it.

This has always been true with every version of autoconf --- it's one of
the less well designed aspects of autoconf IMHO. The GNU folk claim
it's a feature, but I don't think so... (*)

regards, tom lane

(*) their reasoning is that you can pass the same set of --with flags
to every configure script in a large source tree without worrying about
exactly which packages want which options. Perhaps that really is
useful for building a ton of GNU tools together, but it sure hurts
user-friendliness otherwise.

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Lundin 1999-05-14 15:50:47 Re: [HACKERS] CVS
Previous Message Maarten Boekhold 1999-05-14 14:40:35 Re: [HACKERS] configure --with-xxxx problem