From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PANIC: heap_update_redo: no block |
Date: | 2006-03-27 16:45:04 |
Message-ID: | 15168.1143477904@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
"Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu> writes:
> Actually I tried to simulate your situation, but everytime I got a neat
> recovery --
You probably filled the test table and then vacuumed within a single
checkpoint cycle, so that the replay sequence included loading data into
page 1 in the first place. The risk case is fill table, checkpoint,
vacuum, crash; because then the replay starts from the checkpoint and
won't re-create page 1.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2006-03-27 16:49:12 | Re: Advantages of PostgreSQL over MySQL 5.0 |
Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2006-03-27 16:43:20 | Re: Advantages of PostgreSQL over MySQL 5.0 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-03-27 17:18:27 | Why are default encoding conversions namespace-specific? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-03-27 16:41:30 | Re: Domains as Subtypes |