From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | "P(dot) Caillaud" <peufeu(at)peufeu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: LLVM / clang |
Date: | 2010-06-10 13:52:49 |
Message-ID: | 15062.1276177969@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Quick testing shows that clang doesn't get through the configure stage
> on this Debian system -- it looks like some amount of better integration
> with glibc might be needed. Building with llvm-gcc works fine, but I
> understand that using llvm-gcc with native code generation isn't all
> that different from using gcc itself, so that's not a surprising result.
> The only issue is that the float8 regression test fails, so it is
> apparently not *exactly* the same.
There's a buildfarm animal using llvm-gcc, and it passes just fine ...
so the float8 failure sounds to me like another integration problem.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-06-10 13:57:21 | Re: warning message in standby |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-06-10 13:29:41 | Re: [PERFORM] No hash join across partitioned tables? |