| From: | Jacob Hanson <jacdx(at)jacobhanson(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dan Langille <dan(at)langille(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Perpetuating the myth...annoying |
| Date: | 2004-04-05 18:08:09 |
| Message-ID: | 1495719491.20040405120809@jacobhanson.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Monday, April 5, 2004, 12:00:59 PM, you wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Mar 2004, Jacob Hanson wrote:
>> http://www.oetrends.com/news.php?action=view_record&idnum=319
>>
>> Article discussing PHP5 says SQLite is "typically faster than MySQL,
>> significantly faster than PostgreSQL". While I don't doubt it's
>> faster at what it does (with it's small, focused feature-set), the
>> article perpuates the 'Postgres is slow' and 'MySQL is much faster
>> than Postgres' thinking that is no longer accurate.
> I can confirm that SQLite is faster than either MySQL or PostgreSQL when
> using Bacula. I'm working on improving the PostgreSQL.
Yeah, I'm sure it is. I was concerned with the article giving
additional weight to the 'MySQL is much faster than Postgres'
thinking. Sorry if I wasn't clear.
Jacob
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Costa | 2004-04-05 18:08:12 | Re: Perpetuating the myth...annoying |
| Previous Message | Dan Langille | 2004-04-05 18:00:59 | Re: Perpetuating the myth...annoying |