| From: | Pete Forman <gsez020(at)kryten(dot)bedford(dot)waii(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: AW: v7.0.3 *pre-release* ... |
| Date: | 2000-11-07 14:21:12 |
| Message-ID: | 14856.4056.503398.151265@kryten.bedford.waii.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Pete Forman writes:
> The only remaining failure is geometry. The results I got were
> nearly identical to geometry-powerpc-aix4.out. The only
> differences were the order of rows returned by three of the tables.
> I'll submit the results file to pgsql-patches.
I've submitted a one line patch on resultmap.
There was an oddity, on that one runtest on 7.0.3 the geometry.out had
the rows in a different order from three of the select statements.
Repeating the runtest five times passed consistently (with the new
resultmap). Now I realise that in an RDB the set of results have no
intrinsic order but find it a bit surprising that the regression tests
are not consistent.
--
Pete Forman -./\.- Disclaimer: This post is originated
Western Geophysical -./\.- by myself and does not represent
pete(dot)forman(at)westgeo(dot)com -./\.- the opinion of Baker Hughes or
http://www.crosswinds.net/~petef -./\.- its divisions.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Zeugswetter Andreas SB | 2000-11-07 14:44:43 | AW: v7.0.3 *pre-release* ... |
| Previous Message | Pete Forman | 2000-11-07 13:16:31 | AW: v7.0.3 *pre-release* ... |