Re: Can't find thread on Linux memory overcommit

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Kurt Roeckx <Q(at)ping(dot)be>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Jon Jensen <jon(at)endpoint(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Can't find thread on Linux memory overcommit
Date: 2003-08-21 17:14:51
Message-ID: 14777.1061486091@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

Kurt Roeckx <Q(at)ping(dot)be> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 01:04:13PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> "Fatally corrupted"? That should not happen --- at worst, an OOM kill
>> should lose your current sessions. We need more details.

> Even if it kills the postmaster?

Then you'd have to start a new postmaster. But it still shouldn't
corrupt anything.

(Since the postmaster has small and essentially constant memory usage,
it's a pretty improbable target for the OOM killer, anyway.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2003-08-21 17:42:30 Re: Can't find thread on Linux memory overcommit
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2003-08-21 17:13:26 Re: Can't find thread on Linux memory overcommit

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephan Szabo 2003-08-21 17:28:53 Re: "SELECT IN" Still Broken in 7.4b
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2003-08-21 17:13:26 Re: Can't find thread on Linux memory overcommit