Re: obsolete code

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: obsolete code
Date: 2013-02-01 15:38:18
Message-ID: 14763.1359733098@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> fmgr.c contains this:

> * DEPRECATED, DO NOT USE IN NEW CODE

> Should we just drop all support for the old interface now?

Is there any actual benefit to removing it? I don't recall that
it's been the source of any maintenance burden. I'd be fine with
dropping it if it were costing us something measurable, but ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavan Deolasee 2013-02-01 15:54:33 Re: Turning auto-analyze off (was Re: [GENERAL] Unusually high IO for autovacuum worker)
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2013-02-01 15:37:21 Re: Turning auto-analyze off (was Re: [GENERAL] Unusually high IO for autovacuum worker)