Re: bug with constraint dependencies? or bug with

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: bug with constraint dependencies? or bug with
Date: 2003-08-28 19:59:35
Message-ID: 14731.1062100775@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> Hmmm I think there's still something missing here. I was using pg_restore -r
> (actually I was using -L but the list was originally generated with -r) which
> seemed like a good idea at the time. Rereading it now it seems like it
> shouldn't change anything because it says "This option is the default":

Ah-hah. Someone has let pg_restore get out of sync with pg_dump. Will
fix.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sean Chittenden 2003-08-28 20:00:44 Re: Bumping block size to 16K on FreeBSD...
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-08-28 19:56:18 Re: Bumping block size to 16K on FreeBSD...