From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgsql-server/doc/src/sgml/ref create_schema.sgml |
Date: | 2003-02-04 16:08:13 |
Message-ID: | 14701.1044374893@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Neil Conway wrote:
>> Shouldn't we use <varname> tags to denote GUC variables?
> Not sure. We clearly don't do that now. I see all the CURRENT_* names
> as <literal>.
I know I've been pretty sloppy about using <literal> for all manner of
names and keywords, and I think others have too. Does anyone want to
(a) prepare a one-page-or-less style guide setting forth what to use?
We have a style guide for reference pages in the docs already,
but I don't see anything listing recommended markup.
(b) go through the existing docs to replace <literal> where appropriate?
Personally this seems like a lot of work for no visible gain (it's gonna
look the same anyway when rendered, no?). But I won't stand in the way
if anyone feels it's worth doing ...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2003-02-05 03:13:56 | Re: pgsql-server/src/bin/pg_dump pg_backup_archiver.c |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian - CVS | 2003-02-04 12:32:41 | pgsql-server/doc FAQ_hungarian src/FAQ/FAQ_hun ... |