Re: File system choice for Red Hat systems

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: File system choice for Red Hat systems
Date: 2010-06-02 03:26:36
Message-ID: 14604.1275449196@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz> writes:
> I'm helping set up a Red Hat 5.5 system for Postgres. I was going to
> recommend xfs for the filesystem - however it seems that xfs is
> supported as a technology preview "layered product" for 5.5. This
> apparently means that the xfs tools are only available via special
> channels.

It also means that it's probably not production grade, anyway.

> What are Red Hat using people choosing for a good performing filesystem?

What's your time horizon? RHEL6 will have full support for xfs.
On RHEL5 I really wouldn't consider anything except ext3.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Kirkwood 2010-06-02 03:41:28 Re: File system choice for Red Hat systems
Previous Message Mark Kirkwood 2010-06-02 03:06:36 File system choice for Red Hat systems