Re: should I post the patch as committed?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: should I post the patch as committed?
Date: 2010-04-20 16:30:48
Message-ID: 14604.1271781048@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Bruce suggested to me off-list that when I commit a patch with
> revisions, I ought to attach the committed patch to the email in which
> I say that I have committed it. I know that Bruce habitually does
> this, but I've never found it very helpful, since I prefer to look at
> the patch either using the pgsql-committers emails or the git
> respository.

I quite agree --- people who want to read the committed patch are going
to go to the source, not to what somebody claims he committed.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-04-20 16:33:26 Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #4887: inclusion operator (@>) on tsqeries behaves not conforming to documentation
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2010-04-20 16:27:03 Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #4887: inclusion operator (@>) on tsqeries behaves not conforming to documentation