| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
| Cc: | Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] fix build on Solaris 10/x86_64 in 64bit mode with Sun Studio 11 |
| Date: | 2007-01-10 18:16:23 |
| Message-ID: | 14590.1168452983@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> writes:
> in src/include/port/solaris.h we define it to little endian only for
> __i386 - however in 64bit mode the compiler only defines __amd64 causing
> YTE_ORDER to be undefined.
> The other option would be to use __x86 which is defined on all intel
> architectures.
Shouldn't this use the already-defined __x86_64__ symbol? I assume
that's already defined because otherwise s_lock.h would fail...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-10 18:24:14 | Re: [PATCHES] fix build on Solaris 10/x86_64 in 64bit mode with Sun Studio 11 |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2007-01-10 18:15:47 | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] COPY with no WAL, in certain circumstances |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-10 18:24:14 | Re: [PATCHES] fix build on Solaris 10/x86_64 in 64bit mode with Sun Studio 11 |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2007-01-10 18:15:47 | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] COPY with no WAL, in certain circumstances |