Re: What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
Cc: "Matthew O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>, Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)CommandPrompt(dot)com>, "'Joshua D(dot) Drake'" <jd(at)CommandPrompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for?
Date: 2007-04-06 16:59:29
Message-ID: 14484.1175878769@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> writes:
> I'd still like to hear from a Tom Lane or someone else on the project with what
> X86 or X86_64 OS's we need coverage for.

FWIW, I think we are more in need of coverage of different configure-option
sets than of OS's per se.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-04-06 17:04:08 Re: Fix for large file support
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-04-06 16:22:55 Re: Auto Partitioning