Re: Split-up ECPG patches

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, hs(at)cybertec(dot)at
Subject: Re: Split-up ECPG patches
Date: 2009-08-09 17:09:42
Message-ID: 14477.1249837782@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> On Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 05:29:06PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> around nontrivial expressions. So I'd like to see an actual case made
>> that there's a strong reason for not requiring FROM/IN in ecpg.

> I guess there's only one, compatibility.

Yeah. Are there any other precompilers that actively reject FROM/IN
here? If we're just a bit more strict than they are, it's not as bad
as if there is no common syntax subset.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2009-08-09 17:16:47 Re: Alpha releases: How to tag
Previous Message Michael Meskes 2009-08-09 17:04:40 Re: Split-up ECPG patches