From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Dawid Kuroczko" <qnex42(at)gmail(dot)com>, Perez <arturo(at)ethicist(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Cached Query Plans (was: global prepared statements) |
Date: | 2008-04-13 02:17:44 |
Message-ID: | 14355.1208053064@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Jonah H. Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Dawid Kuroczko <qnex42(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> There are other benefits as well. Oracle lets you see the statistics associated
>> with given plans. So you can see how many times given (cached) query was
>> executed, how much resources did it consume and do on.
> Yes, and it also uses that data at both the statement and column level
> to determine what needs more analysis to help build better plans in
> the future.
>> Right now the only way of getting such information from PostgreSQL is by
>> logging all queries and analyzing logs. The current_query column of
>> pg_stat_activity is useless as the (prepared) queries are usually so short
>> lived that you will see one execution out of thousands happening.
> Yes, this is worthless on large active databases. The logging
> overhead alone starts to affect performance.
But somehow, all that stuff with cached plans is free?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-04-13 03:07:10 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Strengthen warnings about using pg_dump's -i option. |
Previous Message | Jonah H. Harris | 2008-04-13 01:42:05 | Re: Cached Query Plans (was: global prepared statements) |