Re: Some architectures need "signed char" declarations

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Some architectures need "signed char" declarations
Date: 2002-01-09 19:15:56
Message-ID: 14306.1010603756@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> I recently got a Debian bug report about 3 architectures where char is
> unsigned by default. There were 2 locations identified in the code
> where a char is compared with a negative value, and should therefore be
> declared as a "signed char". There may be others in 7.2, but I don't
> myself have access to a suitable machine for testing.

> The locations I am aware of are:

> src/backend/libpq/hba.c GetCharSetByHost(): if (c =3D=3D EOF)
> src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c SetCharSet(): if (c =3D=3D EOF)

Fix committed. I looked at every use of "EOF" in the distribution, and
those two are the only ones I could find that were wrong. I did also
find a place where the result of "getopt" was incorrectly stored in a
"char".

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-01-09 19:48:28 Re: again on index usage
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2002-01-09 18:02:19 Re: RC1 time?