Re: Anonymous code blocks vs CREATE LANGUAGE

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Anonymous code blocks vs CREATE LANGUAGE
Date: 2009-09-22 18:27:41
Message-ID: 14218.1253644061@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Should we consider another generic options syntax, while we're on a
> roll? In the long run, that's the best way to avoid having a zillion
> keywords.

If there were any near-term prospect of more options for languages,
I might agree ... but there isn't, so I'm having a hard time getting
excited about this.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dimitri Fontaine 2009-09-22 20:40:58 Re: Anonymous code blocks
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-09-22 18:26:32 Re: Anonymous code blocks