Re: Rule updates and PQcmdstatus() issue

From: Steve Howe <howe(at)carcass(dot)dhs(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Rule updates and PQcmdstatus() issue
Date: 2002-09-07 02:52:47
Message-ID: 142160089997.20020906235247@carcass.dhs.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello Bruce,

Friday, September 6, 2002, 10:58:13 PM, you wrote:

BM> Well, there was a big discussion, and I did bring up the issue in early
BM> August to see if I could get a resolution to it and was told no
BM> conclusion could be made.

BM> I suggest you read the TODO detail on the item and make a proposal on
BM> how it _should_ work and if you can get agreement from everyone, you may
BM> be able to nag someone into doing a patch.
I think it should return the number of rows modified in the context of
the view, and not exactly that of each of the tables affected. And
this would not work well with PQcmdStatus() because it returns a
single integer entry only.

This was working on some previous build, wasn't it ? What was the
previous behavior ? Shouldn't the patch follow that way ?

-------------
Best regards,
Steve Howe mailto:howe(at)carcass(dot)dhs(dot)org

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message ljguo_1234 2002-09-07 08:18:03 Operator startegies for an access method
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-09-07 01:58:13 Re: Rule updates and PQcmdstatus() issue