Re: log_duration is redundant, no?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: log_duration is redundant, no?
Date: 2006-09-16 13:03:02
Message-ID: 14115.1158411782@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> My only concern was that we now have less information with
> log_statement='all' than with log_min_duration_statement.

Well, you don't have the durations, but log_statement isn't supposed to
tell you that. So I'm still quite confused about what it is that you
want to do differently.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark 2006-09-16 13:05:33 Re: Reducing data type space usage
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-09-16 13:00:55 Re: [PATCHES] Include file in regress.c