Re: Config settings for large restore

From: Erik Jones <erik(at)myemma(dot)com>
To: Vivek Khera <vivek(at)khera(dot)org>
Cc: Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Config settings for large restore
Date: 2007-11-28 17:25:28
Message-ID: 13FE06A0-3C1F-417D-9784-84809BB46761@myemma.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Thanks, we're at 128 now but I'll see how bumping that up goes.

On Nov 28, 2007, at 9:46 AM, Vivek Khera wrote:

>
> On Nov 27, 2007, at 3:30 PM, Erik Jones wrote:
>
>> I'm just wondering what is considered the general wisdom on config
>> setting for large pg_restore runs. I know to increase
>> maintenance_work_mem and turn off autovacuum and stats
>> collection. Shoule should checkpoint_segments and
>> checkpoint_timeout be increased? Would twiddling shared_buffers
>> help? What about
>
> At least with 8.0 testing I did a while back, I found that bumping
> checkpoint segments was the biggest benefit. I use 256 segments as
> a matter of course now, even for normal operations.
>
>
>
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> Vivek Khera, Ph.D. MailerMailer, LLC Rockville, MD
> http://www.MailerMailer.com/ +1-301-869-4449 x806
>
>

Erik Jones

Software Developer | Emma®
erik(at)myemma(dot)com
800.595.4401 or 615.292.5888
615.292.0777 (fax)

Emma helps organizations everywhere communicate & market in style.
Visit us online at http://www.myemma.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron Johnson 2007-11-28 17:26:50 Re: Select all fields except one
Previous Message mgainty 2007-11-28 17:25:26 Re: PostgresSQL vs. Informix