From: | சிவகுமார் மா <masivakumar(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Sam Mason" <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Enforcing Join condition |
Date: | 2007-11-15 15:00:58 |
Message-ID: | 139e14f00711150700q7f0ecc73k77fcb7b43c1e897c@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Nov 15, 2007 8:17 PM, Sam Mason <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk> wrote:
> As Albe suggested, a view is about all that's going to help the poor
> people who work with this. When I do this sort of thing, I tend to
> find that there are very few queries that actually need everything all
> together in one place.
True in our case also.
> It's generally that (using the naming above)
> that you'd do a query on "table1", "test" and something that references
> "test". Queries that reference "test", "table1" and "table2" are
> reasonably rare. Of course, it could be that I was just lucky here.
Now I know we are not alone handling these type of tables :-)
Best regards,
Ma Sivakumar
--
மா சிவகுமார்
எல்லோரும் எல்லாமும் பெற வேண்டும்
http://masivakumar.blogspot.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tony Caduto | 2007-11-15 15:21:31 | Compiled debugger plug in for windows, any one have it? |
Previous Message | Csaba Nagy | 2007-11-15 14:54:15 | Re: Chunk Delete |