Re: Enforcing Join condition

From: சிவகுமார் மா <masivakumar(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Sam Mason" <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Enforcing Join condition
Date: 2007-11-15 15:00:58
Message-ID: 139e14f00711150700q7f0ecc73k77fcb7b43c1e897c@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Nov 15, 2007 8:17 PM, Sam Mason <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk> wrote:
> As Albe suggested, a view is about all that's going to help the poor
> people who work with this. When I do this sort of thing, I tend to
> find that there are very few queries that actually need everything all
> together in one place.

True in our case also.

> It's generally that (using the naming above)
> that you'd do a query on "table1", "test" and something that references
> "test". Queries that reference "test", "table1" and "table2" are
> reasonably rare. Of course, it could be that I was just lucky here.

Now I know we are not alone handling these type of tables :-)

Best regards,

Ma Sivakumar

--
மா சிவகுமார்
எல்லோரும் எல்லாமும் பெற வேண்டும்
http://masivakumar.blogspot.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tony Caduto 2007-11-15 15:21:31 Compiled debugger plug in for windows, any one have it?
Previous Message Csaba Nagy 2007-11-15 14:54:15 Re: Chunk Delete