Re: Remaining 'needs review' patchs in July commitfest

From: Pavel Golub <pavel(at)microolap(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Remaining 'needs review' patchs in July commitfest
Date: 2015-07-29 12:25:20
Message-ID: 139522573.20150729152520@gf.microolap.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello, Heikki.

You wrote:

HL> 21 patches remain in Needs Review state, in the July commitfest. Some of
HL> them have a reviewer signed up. I have highlighted some of them below
HL> that worry me the most. What are we going to do about these? For each of
HL> them, I'd like the authors to have some idea on what they need to do to
HL> get the patch into committable state (or if the whole approach is going
HL> to be rejected), but I don't know what that advise should be.

>> COPY RAW

HL> No consensus on whether to add this to the server's COPY command, or as
HL> a new psql backslash option.

I did quick review for this, however I need some more time for tests. May be I will
do it next week. There is a consensus, only detailed review needed.

HL> --

HL> - Heikki

--
With best wishes,
Pavel mailto:pavel(at)gf(dot)microolap(dot)com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2015-07-29 12:28:37 Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
Previous Message Andres Freund 2015-07-29 12:22:23 Re: LWLock deadlock and gdb advice