| From: | George Ant <g(dot)antonopoulos000(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Composite type |
| Date: | 2014-01-29 21:44:56 |
| Message-ID: | 1391031896916-5789584.post@n5.nabble.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Guys thank you for your replies, you really helped me a lot!!!
I haven't use Postgres before and its the first time I am "playing" with
composite types, so sorry if I hurted your eyes with my question!
Kevin I followed your suggestion and seems to work fine.I think it is what
I was looking for.
I am actually trying to transform a RELATIONAL database to
OBJECT-RELATIONAL. Can anybody provide me with any helpful link or suggest
me some "must do" steps? (maybe I need to start a new post for this).
Thank you again,
George Ant
--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Composite-type-tp5789103p5789584.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Neil Harkins | 2014-01-29 21:59:27 | concurrent SELECT blocking ALTER? |
| Previous Message | Pedro Salgueiro | 2014-01-29 17:47:11 | Re: Continuous archiving and restore questions |