Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> Pavel, my apologies for not getting back to you sooner.
> On Wed, 2007-25-04 at 07:12 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> example: I have table with attr. cust_id, and I want to use parametrized
>> view (table function) where I want to have attr cust_id on output.
> Hmm, I see your point. I'm personally satisfied with adding a new
> proargmode to solve this as you suggest.
This will break client-side code that looks at proargmode, and I don't
think the argument in favor is strong enough to justify that ...
regards, tom lane