Re: Feature request: Optimizer improvement

From: David Johnston <polobo(at)yahoo(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Feature request: Optimizer improvement
Date: 2013-11-02 02:57:25
Message-ID: 1383361045606-5776707.post@n5.nabble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jim Nasby-2 wrote
> Should that really matter in this case? ISTM we should always handle LIMIT
> before moving on to the SELECT clause…?

SELECT generate_series(1,10) LIMIT 1

David J.

--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Feature-request-Optimizer-improvement-tp5776589p5776707.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2013-11-02 03:45:06 Re: dsm use of uint64
Previous Message Robert Haas 2013-11-02 01:47:51 Re: appendPQExpBufferVA vs appendStringInfoVA