Re: Commitfest patches mostly assigned ... status

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Commitfest patches mostly assigned ... status
Date: 2008-09-11 21:06:02
Message-ID: 13741.1221167162@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Merlin Moncure escribi:
>> Alvaro actually performed a review on libpq events. We are waiting on
>> his feedback on our changes (based on his review) and the newly
>> submitted documentation. I'll update the wiki accordingly. I wasn't
>> sure if Alvaro was claiming reviewer status or not. It may be ready
>> to go in as-is unless we draw any new objections.

> The patch looks OK to me as it was the last time I looked at it; maybe
> Tom has more comments, so I decided against just committing it.

I haven't got round to looking at it in this fest. If anyone else wants
to look it over, feel free. I think Josh is overrating the patch's
review difficulty --- anyone who uses libpq a lot could review it,
IMHO. You certainly wouldn't need any backend-internals knowledge.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2008-09-11 21:14:46 Re: Commitfest patches mostly assigned ... status
Previous Message Brendan Jurd 2008-09-11 20:53:55 Re: Parsing of pg_hba.conf and authentication inconsistencies