Re: Three weeks left until feature freeze

Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> writes:
> The official JDBC driver is not being shipped with the project for
> exactly the same reasons, I fail to see any compelling reason to ship
> either java PL.

> Unless we are going to create a complete distribution with a unified
> build, or at least a way to build each project (which I am in favour
> of) then we leave the server to itself and all other projects exist
> separately.

The only argument I find interesting for including the PLs in core
(which has zilch to do with how any particular packager ships them)
is that it's easier to do maintenance that way: if we make a change in
an API that affects the PLs, we can change the PLs at the same time.
However, that argument only holds water if the core developers are
able/willing to make the corresponding changes. And in that light,
the fact that PL/Java includes a huge whack of non-C code is very
significant. *I* won't take responsibility for fixing PL/Java when
I break it, because I don't know Java well enough. I don't know what
other people who do core development feel about that --- but I dislike
the idea that when someone changes such an API, the buildfarm will go
all red because there's only one person with the ability to fix PL/Java.

regards, tom lane