rawi wrote
>
> Tom Lane-2 wrote
>> FWIW, I get fairly decent performance for cases like this in HEAD
>> (at least with a GIN index; GIST seems much less able to do well with
>> short prefixes). What PG version are you testing?
> Thank you Tom,
>
> I'm testing on PG 9.1 on UbuntuServer 12.10, 64bit
>
> I'll update to 9.2 the next days and try again.
>
> Kind Regards
> Rawi
Just tested with 9.2: pretty much the same
--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Index-Usage-and-Running-Times-by-FullTextSearch-with-prefix-matching-tp5759021p5759645.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - sql mailing list archive at Nabble.com.